|
Voice of Reason (continued )
I envision an organization with a fourfold mission:
Enthusiasts understand the only chance for Direct Democracy to take root upon Earth is totally dependent upon, what seems to be, an insurmountable task of educating the public. But the task is not insurmountable. This organization would create and produce a DD course and textbook titled "Direct Democracy As A Political Option." The contents would be based upon experiences of Professor Dienel and his Planning Cells in Germany, Citizen Juries in the U.S., and would describe other DD experiments around the globe. The organization would be responsible for persuading college, university and, perhaps, highschool administrators to integrate the DD course and textbook into their political or government curricula. Another of the organization's activities would be the promoti ofon DD to the progressive and non-profit segments of society and the production of a booklet for the general population called "Take Control Of Your Political System: How To Make Citizen Advisory Committees Work. A third—and probably its core—activity would be to solicit and train students as interns to perform one, or more, of four different activities.
Logically, there are two groups that should lead any movement for DD: the academic and the scientific communities. It's the students, teachers, scientists, and philosophers—the active seekers of truth and knowledge—who will be a stabilizing element in any attempt to initiate true democracy, and they should assume their advisory role at the very beginning.
First: As opposed to the economic and political segments, which thrive in environments of greed, deception, and hypocrisy, the inhabitants of both the academic and scientific communities are thoroughly immersed in environments that value truth and knowledge, making them the most logical ones to transmit these values to all of us. Second: These people already possess networks of communications. Through seminars, special classes, sports competitions, and many other ways, teachers, students, and working scientists freely communicate with their counterparts around the world. Third: Many in both communities possess a long-held distrust and dislike of the political and economic elite gained from personal experiences. Fourth: Like the population-at-large, student populations are transitory: here today and gone tomorrow. But unlike the lack of cohesion within the general population, after graduation, there is often a unique continuity and camaraderie within student populations. And, of course, there will always be new generations of students. These are the reasons I recommend the academic and scientific communities as the movement's core. They are the only segments of our population that will, most likely, guarantee the new organization the intellectual integrity and stability necessary in the transitional period during which a society morphs into a true democracy. In all probability, however, neither adult teachers, scientists, nor philosophers will volunteer to lead the movement, for as a whole, they are passive/submissive people, prone to discussion rather than action. In addition, most are fixed in habit, dependent upon Establishment dominated institutions or corporations for economic survival, and fearful of Establishment reprisal. Sadly to say, such fears in the United States are well founded. It means unless the young students of the world—who are still idealistic, optimistic, and unbowed by the pressures of our low, animal-level, hostile societies—initiate this effort for a better future and give it an immediate universal cohesiveness that only they can, I don't believe true democracy on planet Earth will ever happen.
I've envisioned such a democratically structured society named America. Why not read about it and see what a true democracy could be like? Hopefully, you might then join with me and help to make our world a safer and better one. |